PETER HOPKINS

Safety & Quality

Patient Safety • Performance Improvement • Clinical Operations

I lead multidisciplinary improvement work across patient safety, clinical operations, health equity, measurement, and patient experience— turning complex problems into practical systems teams can understand, test, measure, and sustain.

20+ Quality Initiatives Managed 418 Days CLABSI-Free 1,000+ Days Without MICU CAUTI

HOW I IMPROVE SYSTEMS

Improvement starts with understanding the system.

Sustainable improvement requires more than identifying a problem. It means understanding how people, processes, information, incentives, and constraints interact—then designing changes that can be tested, measured, refined, and sustained.

01

Improvement Strategy

Translate complex problems into clear improvement aims, measurable outcomes, and practical interventions that teams can test and refine.

SMART Aims • Key Driver Diagrams • PDSA • Implementation • Sustainability

02

Safety & Reliability

Examine safety events, recurring vulnerabilities, and system conditions to move beyond individual errors and identify opportunities for safer, more reliable care.

Event Analysis • Root-Cause Analysis • Risk Mitigation • Safety Culture

03

Measurement & Analytics

Build measurement strategies that help teams distinguish meaningful improvement from noise while validating whether the underlying data accurately represents the work.

Measure Design • Data Validation • KPI Dashboards • Executive Reporting

04

Clinical Operations & Equity

Redesign workflows around the people who actually use them—patients, families, clinicians, and operational teams—while identifying barriers that can produce variation or inequitable outcomes.

Workflow Redesign • Health Equity • Patient Experience • Stakeholder Engagement

MY IMPROVEMENT APPROACH

01 Define Understand the problem and see the system.
02 Measure Establish what matters and validate the data.
03 Test Turn ideas into practical experiments.
04 Learn Study what changed and why.
05 Sustain Build the improvement into the system.

FEATURED CASE STUDY • HEALTH EQUITY

Improving Access to Professional Interpretation

A multi-ICU improvement initiative focused on strengthening equitable communication for patients and families requiring language interpretation. The work combined stakeholder engagement, sequential PDSA testing, chart review, workflow improvement, and validation of enterprise data.

THE CHALLENGE

Was the system reliably connecting families with professional interpretation?

The project examined how consistently professional interpretation was being used and documented across critical-care settings, while also evaluating whether existing enterprise data accurately reflected what was happening in the clinical record.

THE APPROACH

Improve the workflow—and test the measurement.

The initiative used sequential PDSA testing, stakeholder analysis, patient and family input, chart review, and data validation to evaluate both the effectiveness of interventions and the reliability of the underlying measurement strategy.

01 Define Identify barriers to equitable communication.
02 Measure Establish baseline performance through chart review.
03 Test Use sequential PDSA cycles to change the workflow.
04 Validate Compare chart review with enterprise reporting.
05 Refine Use what was learned to improve the measurement strategy.

RESULTS

Improvement was visible across both utilization and documentation.

Professional Interpreter Use

63.6% Baseline
81.5% After PDSA 1

Interpreter-Supported Conversations Documented

80.3% Baseline
98.1% After PDSA 2

THE MEASUREMENT TOLD ANOTHER STORY

Improving the process also meant questioning the data.

Chart-review validation identified meaningful differences between enterprise interpreter data and documentation in the medical record. Those findings informed refinement of the project's measurement strategy and reinforced the need to validate the data before treating a reported metric as the complete picture.

83.3% Sensitivity of Interpreter Services data in the PIMCU
59.5% Discordance between MICU chart review and enterprise data

Selected results reflect sequential improvement testing and chart-review validation conducted as part of a multidisciplinary quality-improvement initiative.

SELECTED QUALITY & SAFETY IMPACT

Improvement across safety, operations, and patient experience.

Selected examples of multidisciplinary improvement work across infection prevention, respiratory care, complex discharge, and patient experience.

Infection Prevention

Strengthening Reliability in Device-Associated Infection Prevention

Contributed to multidisciplinary infection-prevention work focused on reducing device exposure, strengthening maintenance practices, and improving reliability across critical-care workflows.

418 Days CLABSI-Free Performance
10% Reduction in Central-Line Days
85% → 100% Maintenance-Bundle Compliance
1,000+ Days Without MICU CAUTI

Respiratory Care

Standardizing High-Flow Nasal Cannula Care

Supported standardization of high-flow nasal cannula care to improve consistency, reduce unnecessary treatment duration, and strengthen clinical decision-making across the care pathway.

37.5 → 26.2 hrs Mean HFNC Duration
101.7 → 69 hrs Hospital Length of Stay

Selected for oral presentation at the Pediatric Academic Societies Annual Meeting.

Clinical Operations

Reducing Delay in Complex Discharge

Supported interdisciplinary redesign of discharge planning through clearer ownership, standardized workflows, recurring coordination, and patient-specific escalation.

5.3 → 3.8 days Discharge-Delay Days
~28% Reduction in Delay

Patient Experience

Improving the Patient and Family Experience

Supported improvement work focused on patient and family experience across critical-care environments, contributing to stronger reported likelihood to recommend.

79.5% → 92.0% Likelihood to Recommend
98th National Percentile
99th MICU Percentile
96th PIMCU Percentile

BEYOND INDIVIDUAL PROJECTS

Building the infrastructure for improvement.

Improvement does not happen one project at a time in isolation. It requires systems for setting priorities, understanding risk, tracking performance, coordinating work, and helping leaders see where attention is needed.

My work has extended beyond individual improvement initiatives into the structures that support a broader quality program—from managing portfolios of concurrent initiatives to analyzing safety intelligence and designing systems that make improvement work easier to understand, govern, and sustain.

The goal is not simply to complete projects. It is to build a system that keeps improving.

01

PORTFOLIO LEADERSHIP

Connecting individual initiatives to broader priorities.

Managed a portfolio of more than 20 concurrent quality-improvement initiatives, helping multidisciplinary teams define priorities, establish measures, track milestones and risks, communicate progress, and maintain alignment across complex clinical work.

Portfolio Management Prioritization Stakeholder Alignment Executive Reporting Sustainability
02

SAFETY INTELLIGENCE

Turning safety events into actionable learning.

Analyzed safety-event trends and recurring system vulnerabilities to help teams move beyond isolated incidents. Combined event review, root-cause thinking, preventability, severity, and pattern recognition to support prioritization and risk-reduction strategies.

Safety Event Analysis Trend Identification Root-Cause Analysis Risk Mitigation Safety Culture
03

QUALITY SYSTEMS & DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION

Making improvement work visible and usable.

Designed and improved quality-management infrastructure to create clearer visibility into initiatives, measures, performance, risks, and ownership—supporting a transition toward more standardized, scalable, and accessible digital quality systems.

Quality Dashboards Measure Standardization Digital Transformation Governance Performance Reporting

HOW I APPROACH IMPROVEMENT

Start with the problem. Understand the system. Measure what matters. Test what can change.

Sustainable improvement rarely comes from asking people to work harder. It comes from understanding the system around the work—its processes, information, constraints, people, and unintended consequences. My role is to help teams make that system visible, create a shared understanding of the problem, identify changes worth testing, and build measurement that tells us whether those changes actually made things better.